So the jury awarded a high amount because, even though HIS face wasn't actually responsible for the coffee profits, what the company did was appropriate an image - and what if he'd never learned of their use?
I think in the law we tend to have a cockroach theory. When something finally reaches the courts, you can find a host of other cockroaches which remain undetected. So you hit the landlord hard enough to encourage him - and the other landlords - to f-ing fumigate and cut it out.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
So the jury awarded a high amount because, even though HIS face wasn't actually responsible for the coffee profits,
what the company did was appropriate an image - and what if he'd never learned of their use?
I think in the law we tend to have a cockroach theory.
When something finally reaches the courts, you can find a host of other cockroaches which remain undetected. So you hit the landlord hard enough to encourage him - and the other landlords - to f-ing fumigate and cut it out.
no subject